yadkin

What did you expect? This is normal favoring giving in Yadkin County. It has been going on for years and it will continue to go on because of the mentality of the citizens and what they are willing to keep on accepting.

Whiteman,

If what you say is true, then it was an abuse of power and the judicial system. Doing favors for folks is what often gets law enforcement personnel into trouble. It is not unusual for anyone to have something to hide and women in particular are senstive to someone knowing their miss deeds.

Some folks in law enforcement suffer from delusions of granduer and get too c-o-c-k-y for their own good and others around them.

Hopefully the Sheriff has taken care of this situation. Jason was apparently correct regardless of how he made his case.

This Renae person that started all this is an EMS employee so I am sure she knows some barnies that would do her a favor. I knew more about her than she liked, so she had to know who I was. Once she found out who I was, she didn't want what I knew about her on court records for everyone to see. No barney nor this woman ever confronted me about what I had said.

I will never believe there were any texts sent to this woman. That lie was a good way to get my info.

Creepshow
No where in your pamphlet that was published 20 years ago, does it say that law enforcement usually files the charges. If the crimes are misdemeanor and there is no investigation required then the victim goes to the magistrate. If the crime is a felony, then there has to be an investigation and a sworn law enforcement officer has to seek those felony charges. I'm not aware of a time, where a citizen can swear to a felony warrant.

Your out of date and obsolete pamphlet says this-

Before you file criminal charges yourself, you should find out whether the law enforcement officers responding to your call or investigating your case intend to file charges on your behalf. If for some reason you can't wait or law enforcement will not file charges, you can contact the magistrate in the county where the offense occurred.
You will need to describe what happened to you to the magistrate. Take along with you any witnesses to the crime and any evidence of injury or damage, including pictures, torn or blood-stained clothes and medical reports. Upon hearing your sworn testimony, the magistrate should issue a criminal summons or a warrant, which will then be served upon the perpetrator.

If you are gonna post something, at least make it seem beleivable. Don't get information from sires that have a disclaimer that reads......
This booklet summarizes the criminal process, your role in the legal system, and the resources that are available to assist you, the crime victim.
This pamphlet is not intended to provide legal advice. In order to obtain more information about any subject discussed in this booklet, you should contact the local court or agency responsible for your case, or an attorney.

And they still had no evidence to support requesting more than one user name's IP address.

You can't spin this to make the thugs look ok.

Fins

The cops were happy with just a few posters identities. Did you stop to think that maybe the judge wrote the order broad enough to cover any new identities that might have popped up that same morning but the cops didn't know to specifically ask for. When it didn't happen they only wanted what they needed and couldn't have cared less who the other posters where? You, I, underdog, and others aren't near as important as many of us like to think we are.

Creepshow

The cops may press charges on crimes like drug dealing, speeding, or other things were there is no specific victim. Crimes were there are a specific victim (rape, assault, things like that) the victim must press the charges. That is why a wife beater may not be charged. The wife, not the cops, must press the charges. In this case the person having threats communicated against them had to press the charges, not the cop.

Creepshow

"Is it legal for the cops to go with the woman to someone's house, while in uniform and driving police cars, and threaten to arrest someone for committing a crime without any evidence that they had actually done anything?"

Did they? I wasn't there and I haven't seen any proof that they did. The words of a virtual person mean virtually nothing. Also if they actually did that what proof are they required to provide before they do their jobs and to whom? Take the recent drug sweep. Do you think they were required to carry samples of the drugs they bought from the dealers to show them before they could arrest them? Obviously not. The proof would be provided later. The arrest would happen first.

Good lord a couple of you just cant grasp the fact that you have thug jack legged cops in Yadkin county. I hate to be the one to break it to you but you do.

fiesta pantalones (view profile)
Posted 7:06 pm, 04/06/2014
Fins.

The criminal in this case was calling the victim directly and threatening them. The stuff on goyadkin was irrelevant except that it lead to the person making direct threats to the victim.

You are right. But before the thugs had even asked for the IP addresses, they showed up at one poster's home (the poster had somehow let their density be known) and threatened that poster with several charges, one I believe included libel. Then they wanted all IP addresses to track down everyone in that thread, even if they had not made any threats or had any logical connection to the person that made the threats. And just using white in a user name is not a logical connection.

They are thugs that abused their power

So the cops can get a judge to sign a court order, without the victim ever signing papers saying that they'll file charges? Why would they waste so much time and taxpayer's money on something that is never going to be prosecuted?

Is it legal for the cops to go with the woman to someone's house, while in uniform and driving police cars, and threaten to arrest someone for committing a crime without any evidence that they had actually done anything?

Creepshow

Exactly! No prosecution had begun! She never pressed charges so no charges were ever made against the criminal! It wasn't up to the cops or the da!

Fins.

The criminal in this case was calling the victim directly and threatening them. The stuff on goyadkin was irrelevant except that it lead to the person making direct threats to the victim.

Creepshow

This isn't now or ever was about stuff said on goyadkin

I am saying that if anyone had a person calling them at all hours of the day and night and threatening them, they can go to the police (that was the case here). If the course of investigation lead to goyadkin by reference from the criminal harassing the victim then naturally the police would follow that lead (that was the case here). One other person was looked at (white american) but never contacted because the police ruled him out of being the criminal. The police found out who the criminal was but the victim (after finding out who was harrassing her) didn't want to press charges so the case was closed. This isn't really rocket science. It is basic common sense.

I just read this in that same link from the NC Bar:

You do not have the right to drop the charges once a criminal prosecution has begun. Only a
prosecutor can drop the charges. In most cases, if you tell the prosecutor that you do not want to
continue the prosecution, he will consider your request along with other considerations including
the seriousness of the offense, the perpetrator's payment of restitution, and the perpetrator's prior
criminal record, among other things.

After she went to the police, she signed papers saying that she would press charges. She doesn't have the right to drop it at that point, unless the DA agrees.

Usually, the cops file criminal charges, but the victim can do it if the cops don't.

http://www.ncbar.org/media/...ndbook.pdf

First of all, you are speaking to me as if I'm directly involved in the investigation. I am not. I don't know anymore about the investigation than what has been posted on here.
Furthermore - I don't see any problem. If underdog, fins or Carlton gets their little feelings hurt or someone starts picking on them, then maybe they too, will call those same Barney's.

Barney Milton fife (view profile)
Shew- I'm board with this- it just goes to show- you can't fix stupid.
Underdog, fins, white trash, and Carlton -are all jokes when it comes to this thread.
Come up with something new.😴

No we are not jokes, you and your idiot buddies got caught. You used that badge doing a favor for a friend and you got your butt caught. Fat Al is just too stupid to figure it out.

^^^^^^as far as the above comment, what did they get caught doing that was unethical, immoral, or illegal?

Oh wait, nothing. But let's lash out at them and call them bully's and idiots and belligerent because it makes yes feel big and important. Truth is, you don't even know those guys, probably never met them, and they would go out of their way to assist you, even as you spit on their reputations. Why don't you man up underwear, and spins, and go down to the sheriffs office, talk to the detectives that handled the investigation and come back on here and then post your asinine opinion about them.
(Talk about hiding behind a badge, they gave you their names, sorry, I didn't catch yours?)