yadkin

Yeah. I didn't think I would have to. Funny stuff.

Better learn to count panty boy.

I am reminded of a story that was related to me. A guy was going to jail. During the induction process it was discovered that he had drugs in his anus. What was his defense you may ask? He claimed they were not his drugs and had no idea how they got into his anus. He stuck with that story all the way through the process of having more time added to his original sentence. Ignoring every other factor in that true event, you have to admire this guys dedication to his story and for sticking with it through the whole process.

Underdog...You are clearly dedicated to the idea that I must be wrong in every way. I try to give credit where credit is due. I admire you for sticking with it in spite of how foolish and clearly wrong you have to be. Few people today have the commitment levels and follow through that you have and today you have reached new heights (or lows). I literally just took my hat off to you.

That doesn't mean that I will not tear your idiocy apart. It just means I will give you a little repreave to see what replies come and if it is even necessary for me to.

Mommy dont let the fool blow smoke up your skirt. Its easy to bend the barrel of a riffle or a shot gun. Why you could even do it. Panty boy is still trying to bury his stupidity.

I think that it probably is possible to bend the barrel of a BB gun. I can't, but....I'm not that strong, lol. Not saying the story is true...or false....lol.

Autocorrect changed "unusable weapon" into "usual weapon"

I did enjoy you story though. You entertained me this cold cold morning.

Yadkindogs

Lol. Do you think anyone on here is stupid enough to believe that story you just told? Well maybe one poster is.

Let's see what happened in your fantasy...

The op was laying in wait for the evil children. At just the right moment he sprung into action and allowed the dog to extract his revenge. But wait a minute. The story isn't quite exciting enough yet. The op turns into the Incredible Hulk and in a feat never before saw except on tv, he tied the barrel of a gun into a knot! Then as the evil ones were fleeing in terror the last bit of revenge was taken as the usual weapon was flung hitting the kid in the head. Are you really L. Ron Hubbard?

I could also tear down the rest of your post too. Now it is a neighbor telling the op so the op really doesn't even know if there was a first event. It could have been a neighbor mistaken with their accounts. There were no bullet holes in the dog or property. Etc. I will just let that dog lie because your revenge fantasy was already entertaining enough.

So the little snot nosed degenerates came back with guns yet a second time. Good for the op catching them and rendering their weapons useless. Good for the dog that was let loose to defend itself. The only thing I do think about is the little criminals returning for retaliation and someone get killed. Thats one reason they should be arrested and charged.

Panty boy did one of the kids come home gunless, have a knot on his head, dog bite to the leg?

feista pantalones aka party pants aka pequenopenis: you are a broken record. you insist on shoving your point of view as the only correct one, down everyone's throats. every time someone says anything you don't like, you revive the thread and repeat the same line of jack. over and over and over. and over.

why don't you take the place of the kids and see what happens?

yes, it is plainly conceivable that strangers hiding behind cover, or running between cover, brandishing things that LOOK like guns - whatever the type - and holding them like guns - whatever the type - pointing them at things - whatever the target - might get other people to think that they are REAL guns. the OP is assuming they were using BB guns, as a neighbor related the incident to the OP and it was never established WHAT kind of gun(s) were being used. so if the assumption is made that they are BB guns (which still can cause tremendous damage), it might cost the dog or the OP their life by the way if that is not the case (and especially if the kids are as stupid as yours are). your point of view is to simply let the kids shoot you, catch them if you can, then bring them home to mommy or daddy. of course that's your point of view because you obviously raise your kids to get away with everything.

other posters here bring up other points of view. But you spit the same BS over and over and over.

very one-dimensional. and still very wrong, sorry.

by the way, the situation was taken care of. from what I hear, they were confronted by the owner who let the dog out after them, caught them, took the weapons and bent the barrels on the spot before throwing them back at the kids. I think one of them was hit on the head as he was running away. if you ask me, they were lucky, and now they know the identity of the kids in case of future incidents. I guess one of the kids was also bitten on the leg. good dog.

Here is the deal, All of us old handloaders know how to load rock salt into shotgun shell casings instead of lead shot to spray an animal or someone with nolethal projectliles. This is what PRO was talking about, but he might not load rock salt instead.

Here is the other deal in todays news:

Next time, you better hope the police round them up before I catch them because I have something that shoots too, and I will defend my own from assault. Might fill with salt pellets... might not.

There is no threat of the op threatening to shoot anyone. Learn to comprehend panty boy. There is a threat in your post as has been put on this thread several times.

There are plenty of reasons why the parents need to be contacted so they can have the opportunity to correct their child.


For the record, I'm not saying shoot the kid, lol. I'm just saying bypass the parents and call the cops. As a parent you have an opportunity daily to correct your child. If it gets to the point that a child gets a thrill from trespassing and harming a dog, then chances are the parent has already failed.

Single mom was just an example of a possibility. I had both parents and did a lot they didn't know about. I am sure you did too and both our kids are as well. It could be you have two kids from different families and one of the parents have no idea the other parents are letting their kid run loose with a BB gun around the neighborhood. There are plenty of reasons why the parents need to be contacted so they can have the opportunity to correct their child.

All that is irrelevant to my whole point. There is no reason at all under any circumstance should an adult threaten to shoot at a child with a shot gun because the kids are shooting a dog with a BB gun. That is a much more irresponsible adult than the kids parents are being and shouldn't be allowed to own a firearm.

fiesta-For all we know this could be the child of a single mom working two jobs to support the kid and she may not even know this is going on. That is why you go to the parents first and give them the chance to fix the problem. If that doesn't work go to the police second.

Regardless it's poor parenting. Don't insult single moms by implying that they automatically get to let their children run wild while she is unaware. No excuses. Single parents don't get a free pass. They still need to parent.

It looks like the main problem here is that these kids 1) Have no compassion for the animal. 2) Don't know their boundaries and that its NOT O.K. to wander around on other people's property. 3) Have nothing better to do. All that is the fault of the parents- not the kids. That being said, someone needs to give those kids a wake up call and it's probably not going to be the parents. Call the law and get them involved. Bypass the parents altogether because chances are it's not going to do any good.

I still haven't heard anything that would make me think it is logical to "defend" oneself from a child with a BB gun using deadly force.

You cant tell what kind of gun it is when it is pointed at you Einstein.

Advocate dont confuse me with the moron. I am very aware of how dangerous a bb gun is. There are children with brain damage laying in beds all over the US from bb guns penetrating the skull. There are several counties in NC that have ordinances classifying bb guns as a dangerous firearm. Shame Yadkin is not one of them.

Remember panty boy continues to try and bury his stupidity.

Advocate

No one is saying it isn't serious. I even acknowledged the point of potential injury to the eyes at close range. Logic would dictate that cranial injury could happen as well since the eyeball is soft tissue and the brain is the next thing that would be hit.

I still haven't heard anything that would make me think it is logical to "defend" oneself from a child with a BB gun using deadly force.

Dog and Party Pants.,

Shooting people or dogs with Air Guns is not a joke.

Read this:

http://pediatrics.aappublic...9.abstract

Serious and Fatal Air Gun Injuries: More Than Meets the Eye

Actually maybe the op should shoot the child if he has a dog with him more than a BB gun. According to the site you linked dog attacks have a higher rate of "death or great bodily harm".

http://m.injuryprevention.b...1bca0408be

Go fetch again my toy. You failed to make any point here unless you think a child with a dog should be shot.